Version 1 (modified by 18 years ago) ( diff ) | ,
---|
Various timing efforts
An experiment using a 7 way comparison run on an amd64 2.2 GHz
Running with 1 sequence repeat masked
diane@brisby:~/proj/mussa_analyses/mck_1repeat/ChCoDoHuMoOpRa$ time ~/proj/mussa/build64/qui/mussagl --no-gui --run mck_w20_t14.mupa
real 7m44.508s user 7m43.182s sys 0m0.307s 04/13/06 01:07:58: Modified by diane
running with all repeat masked diane@brisby:~/proj/mussa_analyses/mck_repeatmasked/ChCoDoHuMoOpRa$ time ~/proj/mussa/build64/qui/mussagl --no-gui --run mck_w20_t14.mupa
real 3m36.728s user 3m35.672s sys 0m0.268s diane@brisby:~/proj/ 05/01/06 17:58:07: Modified by diane
I loged out without copying no repeat masking was on the order of 13,500 minutes of real & user time.
--- On a 2.0 GHz x86 Mac
This is with nothing at all repeat masked.
motoko:~/proj/mussa_analyses/mck_1repeat/HuMoRa diane$ time ~/proj/mussa/build/qui/mussagl.app/Contents/MacOS/mussagl --run mck.mupa --no-gui I apologize for blocking the gui while running the analysis
real 5m23.544s user 5m11.089s sys 0m6.421s
This is with simple and low complexity repeats masked.
motoko:~/proj/mussa_analyses/mck_1repeat/HuMoRa diane$ time ~/proj/mussa/build/qui/mussagl.app/Contents/MacOS/mussagl --run mck_simple.mupa --no-gui I apologize for blocking the gui while running the analysis
real 0m19.550s user 0m18.929s sys 0m0.457s